Jess LeClair Photography Blog

So here is another in the very long list of why I love what I do: Kids + Music + a chance to dance and be silly = So Much Fun. I got to photograph a Music Together class in Belfast taught by the lovely and talented Laura Donnelly. She is one of those people you just want to know and be around even when she is not singing and dancing. For once, I never had to even think about how to get these kids to smile - they were having so much fun, they couldn’t STOP smiling! Photographing events like this can barely be called work for me. It was hard not to join in and sing along!

Yes, folks, you read it right! My work has been published in the very first issue of a brand spanking new magazine called Catharsis. You can buy a copy of it at their Lulu storefront. You can also download a pdf of the magazine (it’s less, but you still have to pay) just to see it. There is also a free sample of the magazine, but its only 19 of the 55 pages and alas, my image isn’t included in those 19 pages. Bummer.

However. Because I am so nice (and because the image is already up on flickr!) here is the image that was published:

I made this photocollage (AKA a Hockney, a joiner, a photomontage) while I was living out in L.A. (2001-2002). Creating it was about a lot of things for me, but mostly the way that women tend to feel they have multiple-personality disorder about their bodies and the extremes we go with eating or purging. Also the deeply mixed messages we are handed by society and the media, especially in advertising.

I did this with film and prints so no digital manipulation at all. I just photographed it again to get it into the computer. Making this kind of image is one of my favorite things to do. So here are a few more:

I did this one while I was living in Ireland. This is a lovely little street corner in Galway. This was also done with film and put together by just stacking the prints and taping them down. Its really much better to see it big, so if you click on the pictrue and go to my flickr site, you can see it bigger. Also, if anyone is interested in buying a print of any of these, they are all for sale. Email me for more information.

This one is one of my favorites and one of the first entirely digital ones I did. In March of 2006, I flew to Seattle to help my brother move out of his apartment and pack up his little bitty Honda Civic with all his worldly possessions (and a few otherworldly possessions) so he could move back to the east coast (he’s in Cambridge now). On the way, instead of going straight back home, the two of us drove all the way down the west coast and into the desert to Las Vegas so he and my friend James could throw me a little bachelorette party. This image is a record of that drive from Seattle to Las Vegas. Each photo is from a different point in during the two and a half days it took us to get to there. We went from snow and sleet in Seattle through rain and wind and vivid bright green fields to finally arid desert and neon lights. Its hard to see all those pieces when it is this tiny on the screen. Its best viewed at its largest size, so click on the photo and see it on my flickr site!

This is another digital one. Its an abandoned school bus in Belfast that someone is using as a storage bin. Its just jam packed with stuff. So I let it really distort in the middle there. Again, its best seen big.

I’ve also done these types of collage as portraits.  I have lots more to say about that, but this post is getting very long, so I think it will have to wait for another post!

To Be Continued…

One of my very favorite things to do (besides photographing people of course) is to restore old photographs. I love taking something that is so degraded and ruined and making it whole again. We live in a wonderful digital age when restoring old images is so much easier than it used to be. Time was, the only way to reproduce something for which you had no negative was to re-photograph the old image to get a new negative to make another print from the new negative. And anyone who has ever seen a photograph of a photograph can tell that you loose something in the way of quality. Now we can just scan old photos and make another print! We can even scan old negatives! This summer I taught a digital imaging class with my husband at the Hutchinson Center (an extension of UMO in Belfast). One of my students had unearthed some old negatives that his great-grandmother had taken. The fact that his family still had them was cool enough. But we managed to take it a step further. Using the school’s film scanner, we scanned some of the negatives into the computer and made stunning 8×10 prints in a matter of 15 minutes or so. In a chemical darkroom, that would have taken a whole afternoon of fiddling around. How cool is that? As my student said, “My mother is going to freak out!”

So here are a few examples of photographs that I have restored. For information on pricing, please see the Photo Restoration page.

This first one is one of my favorites. I deliberately put up the smallest image size possible because all I had to work with was a tiny little 1 inch square. Notice how a whole chunk of her hat is missing. It used to be that if a photo was ripped or a piece of it was missing, the only way to fix it would be to hand paint (or airbrush) the missing part. Talk about time consuming. And next to impossible if large bits were gone.

And now look! A whole hat! And you can actually see her! I could make up to an 10×10 image of this woman and still have a perfectly sharp clear image.

This image was so faded, you could hardly see her face!

This one (below) was pretty cool as well. This young man is a tintype (also called a “ferrotype”). The image is printed directly onto a very thin piece of black enameled iron, which is part of why he looks so dark to begin with. The black bits you see are actually the iron showing through where the emulsion has scraped off.

Now, I know there are some people who totally disagree with restoring old images. They feel that these items are historical objects, and as such, should not be tinkered with, just preserved as they are. If everyone had the ability to mount and frame their images with museum quality materials and keep them temperature controlled forever, I would say sure, keep only the originals. But let’s be honest. Most people keep old family photos in moldy cardboard boxes. Or worse, found that their parents or grandparents stored them that way. And without some serious intervention, the images would be lost forever. You can’t really tell in the scan, but at the bottom of the original tintype of the young man, the emulsion is flaking off (it looks like a white stripe coming up his pant leg). Had they waited any longer to have the image scanned, whole chunks of the original image would have been lost. And when it comes to images of your family, what is really more important - that you display an original photograph or that you can see the people in the picture? This way, the image is preserved. What you would really want to do with something as cool as a tintype is display both the original and the restored image side by side. Because, let’s face it, there is something deeply cool about having an actual tintype. It is a piece of history. Its not something that is made anymore (except by a few dedicated photographic artists). But they are a bit hard to see and we know they don’t last forever. So having the image scanned and restored ensures that when your children have children, their children will still be able to see it.

There is something really awesome about the moment when you hand back a photograph of someone’s grandmother or great-grandfather that they’d chalked up as a loss. It’s priceless really. Helping people preserve their own history is in many ways just as important as making the images that will become their children’s history.

Gee, I love my work!